From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!BLUTO.SCC.COM!cwilliams%gburg.DECnet
From: cwilliams%gburg.DECnet@BLUTO.SCC.COM ("GBURG::CWILLIAMS")
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: re: Emery's Lexical Q
Message-ID: <8709231129.AA28329@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23-Sep-87 08:05:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8709231129.AA28329
Posted: Wed Sep 23 08:05:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Sep-87 01:32:50 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: "GBURG::CWILLIAMS" <cwilliams%gburg.decnet@bluto.scc.com>
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The Rational R1000 compiler also accepts the example as legal and does execute
properly. Given the fact that DEC-Ada also accepts it, I would say that it is
in fact legal Ada. The fact that other compilers reject it as erroneous 
suggests to me that the example should be added to the ACVC if the final 
determination is that the example is legal.

Chuck Williams
CONTEL Federal Systems
------