From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!DOCKMASTER.ARPA!Cothrell From: Cothrell@DOCKMASTER.ARPA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: new project Message-ID: <870803204629.533451@DOCKMASTER.ARPA> Date: Mon, 3-Aug-87 16:46:00 EDT Article-I.D.: DOCKMAST.870803204629.533451 Posted: Mon Aug 3 16:46:00 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Aug-87 05:12:19 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet List-Id: I am a member of a project team that is considering using Ada as the design language/implementation language. Our biggest problem is estimating the time, manpower, efficiency, etc... issues. We would like to receive comments concerning metrics that can be applied to an Ada project for determining such things as mentioned above plus any other guages that may be useful. We have already implemented the system(sort of) in C, but the entire effort was basically just to prove the concept quickly, not something one would like to have credited to his name. the size came out to about 33,000 lines of code, with 6 to 9 programmers, and took about 15 months. Not good statistics. Anyway, any help would be appreciated. Scott Cothrell DOCKMASTER.ARPA