From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!think!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!telesoft.UUCP!keith
From: keith@telesoft.UUCP (Keith Shillington @prodigal)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a tasking question for you
Message-ID: <8707132150.AA08928@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU>
Date: Mon, 13-Jul-87 17:15:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcsvax.8707132150.AA08928
Posted: Mon Jul 13 17:15:45 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 15-Jul-87 01:23:53 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The situation you describe with respect to 9.10(7) is impossible.
A cannot possibly resume execution be it via TASKING_ERROR or normal
circumstances until B completes the rendezvous.  The last sentence in 
9.10(6) warrants the completion of the rendezvous.  11.5(5) and 9.5(14)
warrant the order of execution.

9.10(8) [Bonus Answer] Refers, at least, to situations such as an exception
being raised in the process of the assignment; consider, for example, the
situation where a CONSTRAINT_ERROR is raised in evaluating the right hand
side of an expression.  The task becomes abnormal, and the value of the
variable is undefined.

Keith Allan Shillington      telesoft!keith@UCSD.ARPA
...!sdcsvax!telesoft!keith.UUCP  619/457-2700x388.ATT