From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!NOSC-TECR.ARPA!CONTR47
From: CONTR47@NOSC-TECR.ARPA.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: language problem, NYU A/ED-C's behavior
Message-ID: <8704021348.AA03622@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 2-Apr-87 07:50:25 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8704021348.AA03622
Posted: Thu Apr  2 07:50:25 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Apr-87 13:55:01 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

NYU Ada/ED-C on a PC cheerfully ignores the setting of the
array components to value false even though they were
declared to be true..true in value. As a further check
I printed the value of the array components before and after 
the a:= not a; statement and sure enough they were all true
before and all false afterward. I am sending the printout
to NYU for analysis.  I look forward to the experts answer
as to whether we users are all wrong orwhether all compiler
writers have the same blind spot.
regards, sam harbaugh
---------------------