From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3d4bf1aa8fddd02 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: ada2cpp Date: 2000/01/28 Message-ID: <86sn03$hmj$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 578827522 References: <20000109121316.27085.00001168@ng-bg1.aol.com> <86s1sc$1ei$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3891AD32.EA362750@maths.unine.ch> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jan 28 18:26:18 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3891AD32.EA362750@maths.unine.ch>, Gautier wrote: > > check this > > http://ada2cpp.co.il/ > > How can it compete with a famous free translator > - the one that translates all Ada 83 and 95 directly into optimized > native machine code ? Gnat doesn't compile Ada83 code, just Ada 95. Given that Ada 83 is now an obsolete standard, there are probably a lot of less technical managers out there thinking, "If I have to port the code anyway, why not port it to {insert fad language here} instead of Ada 95?". Of course the truth is porting to Ada95 is usually trivial, porting to C++ is often incredibly difficult, and code maintianed in C++ is liable to be significantly buggier. And who knows how much damage to profits, property, and/or life one of those extra bugs may cause? But agreeing with people who employ (or want to employ) you is a lot easier than disabusing them. I can see a tremendous business oppertunity here, for someone who has no moral qualms about doing harm to their own customers if asked to by those same customers. In many lines of engineering there's an explicit code of ethics that this would violate, but not software! -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.