From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e80a1497a689d8a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Laurent Guerby Subject: Re: Ammo-zilla Date: 1999/10/28 Message-ID: <86ogdjtdwz.fsf@ppp-115-70.villette.club-internet.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 541789665 References: <38120FAF.945ADD7D@hso.link.com> <7uutgd$87h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991024.18033546@db3.max5.com> <38189268.43EB150F@mail.earthlink.net> X-Trace: front3m.grolier.fr 941143135 26993 194.158.115.70 (28 Oct 1999 20:38:55 GMT) Organization: Club-Internet (France) NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Oct 1999 20:38:55 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-28T20:38:55+00:00 List-Id: Charles Hixson writes: > [...] But the cost of a unified design of this nature is that, > e.g., garbage collection is eliminated from the language. [...] Quite the contrary, garbage collection is allowed (but not mandated) by the language (see section 13.11.3 of the Ada 95 RM), and it's of course available for Ada compilers targetting the JVM. --LG