From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9f89faeb8f41ad0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dirk Zoller Subject: Re: ifdef replacement for GNAT Date: 1998/04/10 Message-ID: <86g1jm2gcf.fsf@zappa>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 342812784 References: <352287EE.1CFB@tolstoy.mdc.com> <352B8208.41C6@tolstoy.mdc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > John said > > < the GNAT distribution which will support #ifdef type conditional > compilations. gnatprep produces an output file which forms the input to > the compiler. The designers of Ada have thought of so many things. Very impressive. Of the procedural languages I know it is the one where I can express the most in terms of the plain standard language. With the exception of nonstandard stuff imposed on me by the environment I'm programming for. These preprocessor conditionals are missing. Or am I missing something? How is an Ada project (GNAT) being kept portable among various Unices and say, Win32? Assume there is something special to be done in all environments. Without using a nonstandard tool like gnatprep that is. -- Dirk Zoller Remove '_' from the e-mail adress.