From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,6322b2f76bf30f06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Laurent Guerby Subject: Re: Was: Re: Ada95 in Germany Date: 2000/01/14 Message-ID: <86d7r4791u.fsf@ppp-173-172.villette.club-internet.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572683353 References: <387B3F2C.52272A82@frqnet.de> <85ki75$rne$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <387DDCCD.100F2747@frqnet.de> <387DDEFC.58BE357F@rrds.co.uk> <387EF919.6C7E9092@nokia.com> X-Trace: front7.grolier.fr 947877455 4080 195.36.173.172 (14 Jan 2000 19:17:35 GMT) Organization: Club-Internet (France) NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jan 2000 19:17:35 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-14T19:17:35+00:00 List-Id: "Tapio F. Marjom�ki" writes: > [...] In my own case (I do not speak for my company) I would say it > is too risky to stay away from the mainstream. First I should have a > strong evidence done by me or associates, until I could convince my > superiors, but I can't do that evidence without a fairly complete > set of Ada tools and support (expensive) or without spending my > working hours, for which I don't have acceptance of my superiors... The problem with playing the "mainstream" game, is that mainstream is a quite volatile beast. If your time frame is less than a year or if you can afford to rewrite everything from year to year to follow whatever is "mainstream" at a given time, it's okay. --LG