From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4533:: with SMTP id l19mr15409878qvu.23.1565639381852;
        Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b554:: with SMTP id e81mr624463oif.7.1565639381550;
 Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!b26no2851417qtq.0!news-out.google.com!d29ni1261qtg.1!nntp.google.com!b26no2851406qtq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <66682a4f-33ef-4ee8-a611-8899dcc23703@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=213.31.227.255;
 posting-account=_-1HTgoAAADHBS5P7Uw6znR8Rsn20H8O
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.31.227.255
References: <66682a4f-33ef-4ee8-a611-8899dcc23703@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <866bc6d2-3c82-41ef-aece-3f71590484de@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: polyorb
From: cryintothebluesky@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:49:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57043
Date: 2019-08-12T12:49:41-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I tried to get my head around Ada DSA and Polyorb, but gave up due to:

1. Not much help from anyone trying to get basic examples running. Asked qu=
estions on Polyorb mailing list and got no responses.

2. Ada DSA seemed rather complicated and over the years it seems not much i=
nvestment has been made to make it better and more modern. I also suspect i=
t has performance issues at scale, i.e. may work OK for simple client-serve=
r, but if you do a lot of message passing, there may be significant bottlen=
ecks. Not bench marked it much, just my own impression.