From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,91c5b958fecf5eff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch Subject: Re: GNAT exception traceback Date: 1997/06/16 Message-ID: <866456347.1939@dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 248793060 References: <339EFAE3.26C@ccis.adisys.com.au> <33A15F14.1B87D24F@elca-matrix.ch> X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0b5 (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Originating-IP-Addr: 193.72.147.127 (hlm127.elca-matrix.ch) Organization: Deja News Usenet Posting Service X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jun 16 10:19:09 1997 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote: > P.S. the VMS implementation of GNAT *does* provide full tracebacks. That's > because it is part of the VMS ABI. Too bad that all manufacturers do not > pay attention to the exception issue when they specify ABI's. Not only > has Digital always carefully considered these issues, but they have always > had significant Ada input in the design process, so their design for system > ABI level handling of exceptions is nicely consistent with the requirements > in Ada. That's good news for us since we will continue working with VMS for quite some time. Just a small question: what does ABI stand for ? -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet