From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a02:3d43:: with SMTP id n64-v6mr6638994jan.51.1530314306476; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:c6ca:: with SMTP id w193-v6mr1484313oif.1.1530314306377; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u78-v6no872111itb.0!news-out.google.com!p13-v6ni1241itf.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no885378itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.113.16.86; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.113.16.86 References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com> <878t7u1cfm.fsf@nightsong.com> <776f3645-ed0c-4118-9b4d-21660e3bba4b@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <865f290f-65c1-4699-b8ae-28781428ba34@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:18:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53465 Date: 2018-06-29T16:18:26-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 2:05:17 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Shark8" wrote in message=20 > news:776f3645-ed0c-4118-9b4d-21660e3bba4b... > ... > >I'd honestly like the ability to use X'Type; this would allow us to say= =20 > >something like this: >=20 > Please forget that idea, it would be a terrible can of worms in Ada=20 > semantics (or anything close to Ada sematics). See the write-up of=20 > AI12-0123-1 (long killed) for some details as to why. But we *are* talking about an Ada successor language; not Ada itself. This = means a chance to change things out, breaking backwards compatibility, gett= ing rid of things like anonymous accesses, defining a sensible interface. So give some ideas that you've had that wouldn't be adopted by the ARG. May= be some inspiration from some other language. Take macros for instance, mos= t people don't like them because C/C++ has promulgated the "textual substit= ution" idea of macros, but LISP and BLISS both have pretty impressive macro= facilities.