From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,28f9da0e028af98b X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l18g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is the Ada compiler of Polyspace invalid? Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:08:17 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <863bf7a0-e158-4ba7-9c21-a2337fa9432f@l18g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> References: <0c1168ed-e09e-4555-a77e-40620dd80628@f15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.154.212.189 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298048897 9202 127.0.0.1 (18 Feb 2011 17:08:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l18g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.154.212.189; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0b11) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0b11,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18399 Date: 2011-02-18T09:08:17-08:00 List-Id: On Feb 18, 4:27=A0pm, Paul Colin Gloster wrote: > The code checkers from Polyspace are not compilers. But they do contain the front-end of a compiler for the language they support. For one, they need to translate the code into their own internal representation. -- Martin Polyspace user for many-a-year