From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e8499abed674d1c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk)
Subject: Re: Text input on a console
Date: 1997/04/27
Message-ID: <862121330.22snx@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237755163
Distribution: world
References: <01bc524d$a0fe21a0$28f982c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>
Organization: *JerryWare HQ*, Leiden, Holland
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <01bc524d$a0fe21a0$28f982c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com writes:

>However, this does raise another point, of more general interest. The
>behaviour of a program when inputting text from a console is relatively
>undefined in Ada (as in most languages). It may be impracticable to try to
>formally define things more closely (i.e. in the RM), but it may be
>sensible to informally define things a little bit more than the RM,
>somehow.

"Define informally" ?

Although I sympathize with the idea, how would one go about this ?

>When GET is used to read a string, or other type, from the console, should
>the program wait for a carriage-return ('cooked' or 'buffered' mode) or
>just get the characters directly ('raw' mode)?

Like Get vs Get_Immediate ?

The problem is of course how to go about it in a portable way as this is
purely OS dependend.

>Should special characters
>(like backspace, control-D, control-Z, ESC, etc.) be automatically
>supported?

As these are part of Latin-1 that shouldn't be much of a problem, but
how about Ctrl-Home or Gold-F1 ? Or are you talking about the Line Editing
features of the OS ?

> Should there be some agreed parameters in the FORM parameter to
>specify this sort of thing? (And, in which case, what do we do about
>STANDARD_INPUT?)

One solution might be the way C compilers for DOS solved it: using a special
Console I/O (conio) package. This could be in a special Annex, applicable
only to platforms that support terminal based or interactive I/O.

Since the IS Annex comes close to this, I wonder if such a package
(which would do wonders for the portability of console apps) has been
considered.

A good candidate would be a binding to termios, if it were supported
on all platforms (GNAT doesn't, it even can't agree on the implementation
of Get_Immediate between different ports...)

>Comments welcome.

You asked for it :-)

--

-- Jerry van Dijk       | Leiden, Holland
-- Business Consultant  | Team Ada
-- Ordina Finance       | jdijk@acm.org