From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!AEROSPACE.ARPA!hauser
From: hauser@AEROSPACE.ARPA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: How Portable?
Message-ID: <8612182117.AA20996@aerospace.arpa>
Date: Thu, 18-Dec-86 18:46:48 EST
Article-I.D.: aerospac.8612182117.AA20996
Posted: Thu Dec 18 18:46:48 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Dec-86 01:48:57 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I am looking for any reports on projects that have been
done which demonstrate Ada portability.  Our resident
skeptics would like to see evidence that Ada programs
compiled for two different instruction set architectures
really produce the same output results.  Any information
or pointers will be greatly appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

E. Hauser
hauser@aerospace.arpa
(213)336-4363