From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!im4u!ut-sally!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!ADA20.ISI.EDU!JMUNGLE
From: JMUNGLE@ADA20.ISI.EDU (Jerry Mungle)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Use clause
Message-ID: <8608061951.AA27119@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Wed, 6-Aug-86 10:07:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8608061951.AA27119
Posted: Wed Aug  6 10:07:03 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Aug-86 02:07:32 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


  Several people have come out against the "use" clause.  Why?  Coz' it
makes code hard to read, (for humans) as names are no longer fully qualified.

  I thought Ada (registered trademark) was carefully designed over several
years by thoughtful people who were designing Ada  as a vehicle to promote
software engineering priciples?  You mean there might be some part of Ada
that (gasp) doesn't promote good code? :-)
-------