From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!spp1.UUCP!alden%jade
From: alden%jade@spp1.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Preferred style of use-clauses
Message-ID: <8608041746.AA00283@jade.SPP.TRW>
Date: Tue, 5-Aug-86 13:15:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: jade.8608041746.AA00283
Posted: Tue Aug  5 13:15:43 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 6-Aug-86 02:06:51 EDT
References: <860802130119.442853@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



	Unless this and that are text_io, the solution is simple ---
	Don't use "use"

	... Tony

P.S.

	If you really must use "use", I suggest you limit the scope of the
use by putting it only in the block that needs to have it.  When you put the
use in a block (procedure, package body or spec, function, block, etc.), you
limit the damage use can do to just that scope.