From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!vrdxhq.UUCP!karl%grebyn.COM
From: karl%grebyn.COM@vrdxhq.UUCP (Karl A. Nyberg)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: From our "For what it's worth department"
Message-ID: <8607090053.AA07573@grebyn.COM>
Date: Tue, 8-Jul-86 20:53:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: grebyn.8607090053.AA07573
Posted: Tue Jul  8 20:53:11 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 10-Jul-86 00:27:35 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

(with apologies to Paul Harvey...)

The example that Peter Pearson sent about allowing entry names to be
"withed" as a formal procedure in a generic package compiles and executes
with Verdix Ada on the Vax as well (I have VADS 5.1b, and Ultrix-32m 1.1).

Looks like we have two votes for its legality.

	"... and now you know the rest of the story."

-- Karl --

with disclaimer;	-- I own stock in Verdix