From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!glacier!hplabs!ucbvax!usc-isif.arpa!RRACINE
From: RRACINE@USC-ISIF.ARPA (Roger Racine)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: "Statements" in Ada
Message-ID: <8604030607.AA07245@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 2-Apr-86 09:10:39 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8604030607.AA07245
Posted: Wed Apr  2 09:10:39 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Apr-86 05:25:38 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have been evaluating compilers, and tried to obtain a consistent
number of bytes-of-object-code / something (lines of code, semicolons, etc.).
I found that I hit a snag when the unit had many calls to subprograms
(parameter lists have commas separating them, but produce code),
or if the unit did aggregate assignments.

I obtained the most consistent ratios when I counted semicolons and
commas.

I did have one unit that gave quite inconsistent data; it used 
extensive use of tasking.

Roger Racine
-------