From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!umass-cs.CSNET!WOLF
From: WOLF@UMASS-CS.CSNET ("Alexander L. Wolf")
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Garbage collection
Message-ID: <8603170622.AA04208@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 16-Mar-86 17:24:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8603170622.AA04208
Posted: Sun Mar 16 17:24:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Mar-86 01:47:20 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I heard a rumor recently that none of the currently existing, production
quality (now we're *really* cutting the field down) Ada compilers does
garbage collection.

We are developing an Ada program that does a lot of string manipulation and
have found that the program requires a surprisingly large amount of memory
in which to run.  We are using DEC's compiler, which in almost every (other)
respect has proven outstanding.

I'd appreciate any insights...

                                                     Alex.