From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-ada
From: Bryan@SU-SIERRA.ARPA (Doug Bryan)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: anonymous array types and record components
Message-ID: <8602120210.AA01239@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 11-Feb-86 20:54:27 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8602120210.AA01239
Posted: Tue Feb 11 20:54:27 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Feb-86 01:01:32 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Hi all...

One of my students asked me a question the other day that I could not
answer.  Since this does not happen too often, I got out a few reference
books and started digging.  I still don't have a good answer!  Here is
the question...

	X : array (1 .. 10) of Integer;

Using an anonymous array type for an object declaration is valid.

	type R is record
	    X : array (1 .. 10) of Integer;
	  end record;

Using an anonymous array type for the component of a record is invalid.
Why?  What is the rational for disallowing anonymous array types
for record components?

Any hints would be appreciated.

doug bryan
-------