From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,6458d1ee91b224ec X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.19.132 with SMTP id f4mr454092wie.2.1360922603249; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:03:23 -0800 (PST) Path: g1ni12261wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.87.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.meeh.mikalv.net!aioe.org!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: chopping Ada source that have preprocessor symbols in them References: <5111a9d5$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (windows-nt) Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:22:18 -0500 Message-ID: <85txpnm1vp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Cancel-Lock: sha1:GClfc83yqiDnaUJ79/8EBRXFA7Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: 22f825114ee04c55ab71430994 X-Received-Bytes: 1138 Content-Type: text/plain Date: 2013-02-08T07:22:18-05:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: > - I call gnatprep with the original program as input and use > the output as input to gnatchop. I loose the preprocessor > symbols in all resulting compilation units, What's wrong with this option? With the right makefile rules, it should be be fully automated. Why is "losing the preprocessor symbols" bad? They get "lost" either way. -- -- Stephe