From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,11980abf9473b94c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.89.133 with SMTP id bo5mr4169126wib.6.1361288832829; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:47:12 -0800 (PST) Path: g1ni20557wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.87.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.thorslund.org!news.jacob-sparre.dk!hugin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!reality.xs3.de!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Ann] Ada Database Objects 0.4.0 is available References: <5118168b$0$1370$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <85mwv5dfh6.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <511e1a95$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 03:25:22 -0500 Message-ID: <85pq00br7x.fsf@stephe-leake.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uWyMnxKnE1NIoONUWosH3CQQBlI= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: aa90b511f4273c55ab71423599 X-Received-Bytes: 1872 Content-Type: text/plain Date: 2013-02-16T03:25:22-05:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: > On 15.02.13 11:43, Stephen Leake wrote: >> Stephane Carrez writes: >> >>> The Ada Database Objects is an Object Relational Mapping for the Ada05 >>> programming language. >> >> How does it compare to GNATColl, which has a library for this? > > (I'm not the one to answer, but am pretty sure that Stephane Carrez's > implementation of several OSGi/Enterprise style components in Ada will > meet common expectations, There's an interesting concept! I have no idea what "common expectations" would be for such things. I guess you mean "similar to several other existing products", which I am not at all familiar with. > and integrates existing Java knowledge Zero, in my case. I have written some small Java programs, including an Android music player, but none deal with databases. > with > any Ada project. Since many of the aforementioned concepts have been > through some iterations, they are in a field proven state, too.) Pointers, please. -- -- Stephe