From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e29322ee367c19d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: reason67@my-deja.com Subject: Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem? Date: 2000/01/14 Message-ID: <85nhpj$1vt$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572587518 References: <85mqht$6sq$1@fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net> X-Http-Proxy: NetCache@www-blv-proxy2.boeing.com: Version NetApp Release 3.4D6: Mon Aug 23 16:40:19 PDT 1999-Solaris, 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 12.13.226.12 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jan 14 16:10:41 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDreason67 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en]C-Boeing Kit (Win95; I) Date: 2000-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <85mqht$6sq$1@fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net>, "Werner Pachler" wrote: > I am a little surprised! > > As far as i remember UNCHECKED_CONVERSION refused the > unchecked conversion between 2 different sized elements (Ada8x). Depends on the compiler really. I have seen warnings and I have seen errors in Ada83 in the case of 2 different sizes. I would think that if the abstraction is "unchecked conversion" then checking size would be a violation of that abstraction (albeit helpful). --- Jeffrey Blatt Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.