From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe319e8a983326a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner) Subject: Re: C question (was: Ada & C) Date: 2000/01/14 Message-ID: <85m1gu$8281@news.cis.okstate.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572556344 References: <3878D189.80E1CCB4@gte.net> <387CE6DC.4DFDDFC4@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <85ipn5$7pu2@news.cis.okstate.edu> <85j3a5$r3p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <85j4r7$9qe1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <85kppr$1hq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: Oklahoma State University User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (Linux) Reply-To: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:08:57 GMT, Ted Dennison wrote: >Perhaps one could cheat a little by requiring the code to first be sent >through the C preprocessor. Quite possible. This would prevent you from translating macros, like c2ada did, and tie you into the specific defines chosen at the time for the header translation. Which isn't awful, but it prevents translating some of the hairer headers. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe; if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire. -- Friedrich Nietzsche