From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe319e8a983326a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: C question (was: Ada & C) Date: 2000/01/13 Message-ID: <85kppr$1hq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572098993 References: <3878D189.80E1CCB4@gte.net> <387CE6DC.4DFDDFC4@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <85ipn5$7pu2@news.cis.okstate.edu> <85j3a5$r3p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <85j4r7$9qe1@news.cis.okstate.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x27.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 13 15:08:57 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <85j4r7$9qe1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org wrote: > Unfortunetly, c2ada mainly works on header files, which is what's > really useful (especially if you listen to Robert Dewar.) It also I'd agree with that. Thinking about it, for completeness you'd almost need a full implementation of the C preprocessor. I'm not sure what that would involve, but it doesn't sound easy to me. Perhaps free access to the preprocessor was the reason C was used for c2ada. Perhaps one could cheat a little by requiring the code to first be sent through the C preprocessor. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.