"Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:op.vczdx3teule2fv@garhos...
>While sometime, I would like to better understand some choices, like the
>one I've meet, which is that it does not accept nested package
>specifications, or, more important, why it don't wants "type ... is new
>...;". If I could understand the rational behind this latter restriction,
>this could perhaps help me to redesign.

It's to avoid overloading, especially the implicit declaration of
user-defined subprograms.