From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,556e5b18154df788
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.207.2 with SMTP id fw2mr3506578qab.6.1365342759678;
        Sun, 07 Apr 2013 06:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ef9ni13649qab.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.n-ix.net!news.hufnagl.info!fu-berlin.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interresting,
 possibly buggy behavior in GNAT generics w/ expression function.
References: <ac196de8-8d24-4302-8e3b-e0007d691095@googlegroups.com>
 	<lysj3eir9b.fsf@pushface.org> <kj5dn6$978$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 	<65330bfe-39e4-4f7b-85f5-e06e9458bf29@googlegroups.com>
 	<kjd9oi$966$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 07:14:30 -0400
Message-ID: <85k3olb2w9.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:grKbQi5c6uetlP6oWwfXlgJBqHA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com
Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com
X-Trace: a9bf0515abd97ede7d80114090
X-Received-Bytes: 1473
X-Original-Bytes: 1790
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2013-04-02T07:14:30-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> "Adam Beneschan" <adam@irvine.com> wrote in message 
> news:65330bfe-39e4-4f7b-85f5-e06e9458bf29@googlegroups.com...
> On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:04:28 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>
> ...
>>Randy, it looks to me that the original code called Image(...) only from 
>>inside the
>>generic specification or body, not outside.
>
> OK, I didn't see that, because the OP I got only had a description of the 
> spec in it, no code at all.

The code is in function expressions in the spec; no body required.

-- 
-- Stephe