From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!enother.net!enother.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! References: <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:36:59 -0500 Message-ID: <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:t0cuYcpxG1UhCRFG6QK4wGy4/yA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: 0f2f05396d1beeef2f4a324188 X-Received-Bytes: 908 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2055796099 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20193 Date: 2014-06-10T04:36:59-05:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry writes: > I would add to this thread that we do not need a new language for safety > I think Ada can do that... Can anyone comment on why Apple didn't just use Ada? -- -- Stephe