From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.42.197.69 with SMTP id ej5mr10778483icb.7.1411134682714; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!h15no1747578igd.0!news-out.google.com!rp1ni1431igb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:51:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:51:21 -0400 From: Peter Chapin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Lazy evaluation References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <85idneIsZeZHqYHJRVn_vwA@giganews.com> X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-MQwSOFjK8z/aQxm8+FRiI/DLHmb1togb7MYLscQn0oAH7DmbfLflA0TMKJnOoeiwMdOxvL1/y8hpaFS!oWvQpS401OXcubQH+sWzLQrxvr4cZn+FhWLtysaVvse6yZejHNOUS3g+kX4n1QQ= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 1711 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:189057 Date: 2014-09-19T09:51:21-04:00 List-Id: On 2014-09-18 15:15, Victor Porton wrote: > Can we incorporate into Ada some kind of lazy evaluation (as in Haskell), > without breaking backward compatibility? > > If yes, would this be much useful? Speaking in generalities lazy evaluation tends to make it difficult to reason about the performance characteristics of a program. It is my understand this is sometimes a problem for Haskell programs that have significant performance requirements. Thus it appears that lazy evaluation would be an anathema as far as Ada is concerned. Peter