From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,82dadb8a32a5cd0b X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u3g2000prl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Adam Beneschan Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Emacs and long file names Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <85af303a-a6f2-40c7-b64e-8da565df3b4f@u3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> References: <755de929-67b4-4de6-8982-a0bfc43effc0@z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <82y6f88ztj.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <82vdab5d4l.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1274887045 30062 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2010 15:17:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u3g2000prl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12037 Date: 2010-05-26T08:17:25-07:00 List-Id: On May 26, 12:35=A0am, Stephen Leake wrote: > > I'll also think about your suggestion to allow myself a wider screen. > > I think my reluctance has been a throwback to the old days when a lot > > of printouts > > "printout"? what's a "printout"? :). Save a tree, and the fossil fuel > needed to transport it, and/or the harsh chemicals used to recycle it. > Electrons are recyclable; most other stuff really isn't. Tried that. My problem was that I found out that if I tried to mark a line of source with a highlighter, the highlighting didn't move when I scrolled the text. Plus it was kind of nasty trying to clean the ink off my monitor screen. :) :) :) Just kidding. (Insert old joke with punchline "there's whiteout all over your screen" here.) But while I think some people are able to cope without printouts, others sometimes need to have that piece of paper to look at. Don't ask me why. -- Adam