From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9cccf6ef6149fdaa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Operators -> unit analysis Date: 2000/01/07 Message-ID: <854va4$prk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 569429517 References: <38620350.48F8FC08@gecm.com> <83u8l0$5i5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84rd2f$snm$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> <84thof$9r3$1@nntp4.atl.mindspring.net> <387383D0.4EA02E95@earthlink.net> <850jiq$mad$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3874D0BE.82F04763@Raytheon.com> <853lkg$tgj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x31.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jan 07 15:04:48 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-01-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <853lkg$tgj$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar wrote: > In article <3874D0BE.82F04763@Raytheon.com>, > Algol-68 designers regard it as a horrible mistake. One should > only rely on precedence of operators where the precedence rules > are clear and obvious. This cannot be the case by definition > for user defined precedences. I think you are saying that in practice it gets to be a mess. I do appreciate that. But the above statement would only be true if they are truly user-defined. If the operators and precedences are in fact created by the user to match existing precedences for established mathematical notations, then I think it *would* be clear and obvious to any user. For instance, if I make a notation including operators to mimic BNF productions (which I am doing, btw), any reasonable user would expect to *not* have to put parenthesis around a production's right side just to keep the BNF "::=" operator from being evaluated prematurely. -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.