From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.52.66 with SMTP id b63mr3696874ioa.66.1522623157197;
        Sun, 01 Apr 2018 15:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:58c9:: with SMTP id s9-v6mr409986oth.0.1522623156672;
 Sun, 01 Apr 2018 15:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feed.usenet.farm!feeder4.feed.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u184-v6no3459021ita.0!news-out.google.com!d3-v6ni1808itf.0!nntp.google.com!k65-v6no1669249ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 15:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e1e73838-2e45-4f53-9cbf-e28e85100fd1@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.245.160.83;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.245.160.83
References: <e1e73838-2e45-4f53-9cbf-e28e85100fd1@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <853b698c-204b-4a5e-a486-b2d7cb664b3a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: limited agregate and limited components default initialization
From: Jean-Claude Rostaing <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 22:52:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51284
Date: 2018-04-01T15:52:36-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

... I don't count the number of such negative posts or yours... you should =
worry, you might get ulcera or cancer with such a mindset.

Kidding aside, ok, access discriminant. No problem. I suppose they did so a=
s they wanted the accessed object to be bound for its life time, with the a=
ccessor type, I understand the reason.
I'll dig into the book to see their own implementation, which did accepted =
non limited types (whereas I had to make it simply unconstrained private). =
The buggy part in mine wasn't the accesor type, so I'm positive I can tweak=
 their implementation to add implicit dereference. I'll come back after.