From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4215feeab2a8154a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n2g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: REH <spamjunk@stny.rr.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <850893f5-46e5-443f-af0f-f16eef5cfa37@n2g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
References: <7q2385104kihs87d79p8kfphuoki6r01vq@4ax.com>
 <7961a91c-a5af-40e2-bbc0-6bf69a98176d@z31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<gnc585975lmscgmvat9avedckgs3du6pin@4ax.com>
 <362f621e-a01c-4772-ba02-4e18e9962188@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
	<b6t5855cc2epg9h3s1qb9ulm96bp3pfphk@4ax.com>
 <128d63da-361f-4e33-be5e-e06bdc71e39f@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
	<wcc8whovk76.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.91.173.42
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1250112296 6428 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2009 21:24:56
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:24:56 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n2g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.91.173.42;
	posting-account=GwkXCgoAAABFSG45Q--uHVZG6zn6ec-e
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.0.11)
	Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.1 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7707
Date: 2009-08-12T14:24:50-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Aug 12, 4:41=A0pm, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com>
wrote:
> The philosophy has nothing to do with "explicitly".

Sure it does. I have to *explicitly* throw an exception or call
something that throws an exception, to raise an exception in C++. In
Ada, I don't. It automatic. A simple assignment can raise an
exception. Most C++ compilers even have a flag to remove exceptions
because it make the build a lot smaller. With MSVC++, you have to
explicitly set a flag to get exceptions in the first place.

REH