From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b69a8818c20ab9f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Y21C Bug Date: 2000/01/05 Message-ID: <84ujpj$6ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 568414642 References: <84nqbo$q28$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84o0g2$u8v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84pvrs$7q1@ftp.kvaerner.com> <84t8qk$b9q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <387246D7.8B1B2E8B@earthlink.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x41.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jan 05 05:11:24 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-01-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <387246D7.8B1B2E8B@earthlink.net>, Charles Hixson wrote: > Robert Dewar wrote: > > > > > Indeed it is a HUGE effort to make some code 64-bit clean, and > > my guess is that unices will support 32-bit code for a long > > time, and it will be a bad earthquake when there is a > > requirement to change legacy 32-bit code to make it 64-bit > > compatible (as will possibly happen at the date blow up time > > (which will happen in our life times for at least some of us). > > > > But I believe that it would be a mistake to begin conversions of > programs to 64-bit mode for the next couple of years (except in > special circumstances). After that... > > With 64 bit numbers available, I propose a new time standard, based > around 64-bit floats. We need a SMALL floating number (16 bits?) to > specify the millennium, and a large floating number (64 bits) to > specify the time. (0 = center of the millennium, +- 1 = +- 500 > years, etc.). Current Millennium = 2 (years 2,000->2,999, CE). (I > allow for a year 0 before the year 1, if you wish to print that out > as 1 BC, that's merely a formatting issue.) > I am sort of guessing that a smiley is missing here, but if not, time is clearly a case where absolute error control and not relative error control is important, so the use of fixed point is far preferable. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.