From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3edde39ad90f1b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Representation clauses and streams Date: 2000/01/03 Message-ID: <84p1ot$c7n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 567547211 References: <84du8g$c67$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <386F900C.235952C2@averstar.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 03 02:33:01 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-01-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <386F900C.235952C2@averstar.com>, Tucker Taft wrote: > Apparently GNAT has not yet been revised to > follow the updated advice, which is quite reasonable given > that the associated AI, AI-195, is still a work-item -- it > is not yet officially "approved." For the full AI, see: And indeed we will have to consider carefully how to deal with this, since changing to meet the new advice is a non-upwards compatible change which is sure to cause chaos for many of our users. So we have not decided what to do about this yet. Apparently some other compilers failed to follow the RM advice in the first place, which is what is giving rise to the push to revise the language here. A tricky situation .... Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.