From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfb98535bcaeb3a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Controlled types in local generics?
Date: 1999/12/30
Message-ID: <84g324$q9r$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 566538125
References: <386AFDA8.7C3110CC@telepath.com> <386B3015.F2F094CB@mail.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x42.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 30 17:10:46 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-12-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <386B3015.F2F094CB@mail.com>,
  Mats Weber <matsw@mail.com> wrote:
> Maybe this could be circumvented by a generic package similar
> to Ada.Finalization that could be instantiated locally and
> provide the same facilities as Ada.Finalization ?
>
> Would it be feasible to write such a package for GNAT ?

Probably, but it is usually quite easy to work around this
problem in practical cases.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.