From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.51.68 with SMTP id c4mr11685446qag.7.1380549200568; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.71.207 with SMTP id x15mr8981qeu.18.1380549200507; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!q9no416517qas.0!news-out.google.com!9ni803qaf.0!nntp.google.com!q9no416512qas.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.59.203.116; posting-account=7Oy7OQoAAABhVYFOo553Cn1-AaU-bSfl NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.59.203.116 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <84e24600-7972-4819-b97c-434f1b32648a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Dereferencing and style guides From: Eryndlia Mavourneen Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:53:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183533 Date: 2013-09-30T06:53:20-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, September 30, 2013 1:35:09 AM UTC-5, Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > . . . > So what do you think about the topic? > Are there other people here favoring non-mandatory .all? For me, it depends upon the context and my mood at the moment. I like the clarity of the explicit dereference .all; however, sometimes it just seems silly or clumsy. -- Eryndlia (KK1T)