From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3edde39ad90f1b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Representation clauses and streams
Date: 1999/12/29
Message-ID: <84du8g$c67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 566224009
References: <tgso0lg67p.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x26.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Dec 29 21:35:13 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-12-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <tgso0lg67p.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>,
  Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote:
> Well, I don't like this behavior at all.

Then you should submit a comment, this is the required behavior
as specified in the RM.

> Is there any reason why GNAT
> ignores the implementation advice 13.13.2(17)?

GNAT is NOT ignoring this advice

> What are other compilers doing here?

At least one other compiler gets this wrong. We have been
discussing in the ARG whether to modify the RM rules in this
area to give something more to your liking :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.