From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,94f5813fe779d7b3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.11.199 with SMTP id s7mr144120pbb.5.1317849358352; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Path: lh7ni12373pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n15g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AWS on Mac OS X? Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <849f5854-55e7-48be-b1be-46763be0fd47@n15g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> References: <87fwj7r7ey.fsf@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.3.40.82 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1317849358 23089 127.0.0.1 (5 Oct 2011 21:15:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n15g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.3.40.82; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18315 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2011-10-05T13:16:04-07:00 List-Id: On Oct 5, 1:42=A0pm, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > Is there a special reason that AdaCore doesn't distribute AWS for Mac OS > X? Yes, there are two reasons: 1. git clone as shown on http://libre.adacore.com/libre/tools/aws/ 2. make setup build install Or something like that. It worked for me. I have to admit that it was much more involving on Windows, as it required the installation of Cygwin. Then I understand that already compiled binary packages provide a lot of added value. But interestingly, they are not available on Windows, either. Or at least I was not able to find them. -- Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com