From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1673f51583843955
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jim@dcs.gla.ac.uk
Subject: Re: gnat304a and win32ada :(
Date: 1996/12/02
Message-ID: <849529346.18999@dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201867167
references: <dewar.849268636@merv> <57ma1q$b8@singer.cent.gla.ac.uk>
x-http-user-agent: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.01; Windows NT)
x-originating-ip-addr: 130.209.240.22 (xterm6.dcs.gla.ac.uk)
organization: Deja News Usenet Posting Service
x-article-creation-date: Mon Dec 02 12:35:40 1996 GMT
x-authenticated-sender: jim@dcs.gla.ac.uk
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.849268636@merv>,
dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
> 
> iJim Burns says
> 
> "I guess that there are some object files or libraries which the compiler needs a
> nd can't find, but I'm clueless as to what to do about it.
> 
> I've tried this installation on two different machines, on windows NT 4.0 and wi
> ndows 95. I don't think this is an OS setup problem.
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
>         -- Jim"
> 
> Clues are available in the documentation!

:-)

> Yes, indeed you are missing libraries, see docuemntation for details
> on what is needed. You have to buy these libraries from Microsoft.
> 
> The current NT version that we are working on (and which you will be
> able to see demonstrated at Tri-Ada) will not have this requirement

If you mean:

"To use Win32Ada with GNAT�3.04A the Microsoft Win32 SDK (Software
Developer's Kit), which comes with membership in The Microsoft Developer
Network, is needed. In addition, some C runtime libraries like those
available with Microsoft Visual C++, are needed.
"

then I've got them. I have MSDN _and_ MSVC2.0 installed on both machines.
Both are set up as per instructions (or how I've interpreted the
instructions) and both produce the same results.

I thought, perhaps, that there were a particular version of the libraries
which were needed, or that I hadn't included the correct pathnames for
the libraries in the .ld files. I've checked, checked, and checked again.
I would really appreciate some help with
this.
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
      http://www.dejanews.com/     Search, Read, Post to Usenet