From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb45e48e8dddeabd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Protected Object Tutorial #1
Date: 1999/12/27
Message-ID: <848ajb$o39$1@nntp2.atl.mindspring.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 565377324
References: <839toq$pu$1@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
 <slrn85h77n.68i.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net> <385AC716.7E65BD5C@averstar.com>
 <slrn85nr62.4ps.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net> <s5sijcssrg3125@corp.supernews.com>
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.991226141254.25330A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
 <845pgk$qkf$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <slrn86d0ao.fbn.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net>
 <846rk7$gba$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
X-Server-Date: 27 Dec 1999 18:19:23 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-27T18:19:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <846rk7$gba$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
	Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

>Really the point is that protected objects are best thought of
>as a framework for constructing very simple synchronization
>primitives with a minimum of active code. As soon as a protected
>object acquires complex internal logic, it is better represented
>by a separate Ada task.

Thanks for this clarification of your view.  The originaly phrasing
was something of a shock.  The real issue is that, when designing
for concurrency, one must select the mechanism best suited to the
problem to be solved.  Protected objects represent a significant
improvement over semaphores for mutual exclusion but need to be
used sparingly in a multi-tasking design.  As your note implies,
a protected object is not a substitute for a task.  Then again,
a task is not a substitute for a subprogram.  The difficulty of
designing with tasks is non-trivial, even when a rich set of
mechanisms is available, as in Ada.   

Richard Riehle