From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ffc1e,fb45e48e8dddeabd
X-Google-Attributes: gidffc1e,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb45e48e8dddeabd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Protected Object Tutorial #1
Date: 1999/12/27
Message-ID: <846rk7$gba$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 565196838
References: <839toq$pu$1@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
 <slrn85h77n.68i.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net> <385AC716.7E65BD5C@averstar.com>
 <slrn85nr62.4ps.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net> <s5sijcssrg3125@corp.supernews.com>
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.991226141254.25330A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
 <845pgk$qkf$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <slrn86d0ao.fbn.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Dec 27 05:06:20 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-12-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <slrn86d0ao.fbn.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net>,
  kaz@ashi.footprints.net wrote:
> That's the sense that I get. For example, earlier in the
debate I was told that
> when the requirements change in certain ways, you have to
abandon protected
> objects. E.g. if you need an object's operation to call into
another subsystem
> which may call back.

Really the point is that protected objects are best thought of
as a framework for constructing very simple synchronization
primitives with a minimum of active code. As soon as a protected
object acquires complex internal logic, it is better represented
by a separate Ada task.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.