From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: john@assen.demon.co.uk (John McCabe) Subject: Re: Multiple reasons for failure of Ariane 5 (was: Re: Ariane 5 - not an exception?) Date: 1996/08/30 Message-ID: <841430335.4870.2@assen.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 177515954 x-nntp-posting-host: assen.demon.co.uk references: <4vjea6$gj7@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <32217BC4.3583@lmtas.lmco.com> <505pk9$bck@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: rav@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au (++ robin) wrote: <..snip..> >---It does? We're not dealing with a student here, but an >adult....from NASA. Please credit him with a bit of nous >in finding out the information. If he could not find out >how to do it, then it's a problem, isn't it. ++robin, Why don't you just give up on this pointless argument. You are the only one ever to make a comment based on the Ariane failure that it was a programming error. READ THE REPORT then go off and get a bit of experience in the real-time embedded system world, and if you still think it's a programming error, find a new career. Best Regards John McCabe