From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b6619eb9cada212 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Help me to chose between ADA 95 and C++ Date: 1999/12/22 Message-ID: <83qr32$nur$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 563759283 References: <01bf37fb$a91afb60$0564a8c0@IS-D2D04C.test> <829rbv$a8m$1@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net> <01bf3e32$0b9dc880$022a6282@dieppe> <385112AE.7E2CFA9@rdel.co.uk> <385F6CEA.8DC03C7D@acenet.com.au> <385FBEB6.8D34217@averstar.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Dec 22 15:34:59 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-12-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <385FBEB6.8D34217@averstar.com>, Tucker Taft wrote: > Geoff Bull wrote: > > References? > > Here are a couple. The first is a presentation with a number > of graphic charts illustrating the savings using Ada > relative to other languages: > > http://www.adaic.org/docs/present/ajpo/pll-cost/html/ > > There are further references interspersed through this presentation. I found a single page/slide listing 6, some of which themselves were compendiums of other studies. Wow. > This second one is a study done by Verdix (now Rational) about their > experience using Ada and C in developing compiler components: > > http://www.rational.com/sitewide/support/whitepapers/dynamic.jtmpl?doc_k ey=337 My favorite line: "This graph shows that customers were far more unhappy with features implemented in C than they were in Ada." -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.