From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7c79b932e1a23ed9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: reason67@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: Type casting question
Date: 1999/12/21
Message-ID: <83p0mc$g7g$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 563461027
References: <385E87D8.2B44B800@tridsys.com> <83o9d0$ul9$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <83of3h$352$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <83ookh$aek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: NetCache@www-blv-proxy1.boeing.com: Version NetApp Release
 3.4D6: Mon Aug 23 16:40:19 PDT 1999-Solaris,
 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 12.13.226.11
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Dec 21 22:58:29 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDreason67
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en]C-Boeing Kit (Win95; I)
Date: 1999-12-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <83ookh$aek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

> By convention on this newsgroup, we assume Ada means Ada, i.e.
> Ada 95. If people are stuck using an obsolete version of the
> language, they need to say so.

I think it is risky to assume that new people know the conventions here.
Personally, I have been reading and posting here for a couple months and
I did not know that there was such a convention until you were kind
enough to point it out to me.

I think it is far safer to determine which version of the language they
are using from context. When people use Ada 83 syntax, I assume they are
using Ada 83 unless they state otherwise.
---
Jeffrey S. Blatt


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.