From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-08 05:43:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada
From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net>
Subject: Re: the Ada mandate,
 and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bit     addressing and OOP
References: <9fa75d42.0304300412.3c9f8157@posting.google.com>
 <98BC68183770643E.43B22CFE5F4D5EFD.5566989BE627964B@lp.airnews.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305010645.7a5572ed@posting.google.com>
 <3EB1C603.7788E194@adaworks.com>
 <ba162549.0305020720.4da44159@posting.google.com>
 <b8u3m2$emd$1@south.jnrs.ja.net> <MdmdnaZFI5fz2S6jXTWcpA@gbronline.com>
 <ti6jo-93d.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net>
 <m9SdndluvPKW_CWjXTWcpw@gbronline.com>
X-face: 
 "i;@/WO(?;[KC9sW;wG/4@H[_VFFH4?QHJ#O(?m}7fQMrJ,]0THA'\|e-EPG_>56Mi}_RRhBS'a2}u_7jm)0_+'=$V#E2r4#IQE/d)yMv3_4@hl<)mA&*tDN/
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Message-ID: <83jno-vjm.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 12:41:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.86.1.13
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 1052397683 209.86.1.13 (Thu,
 08 May 2003 05:41:23 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 05:41:23 PDT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:63300 comp.object:62975
 comp.lang.ada:37064
Date: 2003-05-08T12:41:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In comp.lang.java.advocacy, Wesley Groleau
<wesgroleau@despammed.com>
 wrote
on Tue, 06 May 2003 20:28:09 -0500
<m9SdndluvPKW_CWjXTWcpw@gbronline.com>:
> 
>>>I own a "C Primer" which NEVER informs the reader that
>>>C is case-sensitive.  And the only hint I could find
>>>(and I was hunting for one) was a code snippet
>>>
>>>void funcname (FILE file)
>>>and this was in chapter eleven!
>> 
>> It's also wrong; it should be
>> void funcname(FILE * file)
> 
> I think that's my mistake, not the book
> (not handy to look up right now)
> 

No problem, the C compiler would have caught it. :-)

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.