From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6fc39bb88f30631d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: john@assen.demon.co.uk (John McCabe) Subject: Re: HOOD? Date: 1996/07/05 Message-ID: <836589195.10560.0@assen.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 163881095 x-nntp-posting-host: assen.demon.co.uk references: <836340235.16937.0@assen.demon.co.uk> <4rgp4p$iv6@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be> newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: ian@rsd.bel.alcatel.be (Ian Ward) wrote: <..snip..> >I am amazed that you like the IPSYS HOOD tool John, I always thought >it was really crap. I didn't say I _liked_ it, just that it was far better than the HOOD Nice one :-) >I was once HOOD tool coordinator on a small, 115 >object, twenty man project, and we had a guy, claiming to be an >accountant, demanding to be paid (have you guessed the slow paying >company yet? Answers in private please, I do not want to be sued!!) So you used to work for that lot did you? :-) >I almost choked with disbelief that they wanted money for it. However, >they have had five years to sort it out, so to be fair, I can believe >that it now works. It is good to see it has become a success, I will >bear your comments for future reference. It is amazing that I could >have been so badly tainted by poor reliability. It is not surprising >that millions of people had left the Ada scene by 1987 with a sour >taste in their mouths. Perhaps I should be a bit more forgiving, it >is difficult though when one is not enjoying the work. I've used a couple of versions of it over the last few years. It seems to have got pretty stable, but it's by no means perfect. >As I said in an earlier post, I think TNI's STOOD tool is the best HOOD >tool I have ever used. In fact, I think it is the best tool I have ever >used of any description, full stop, the cross referencer, it gets me >tingly just thinking about it. Rock on. I'm glad someone brought up this subject because I've learned of at least 2 HOOD tools I'd never heard of before! (I haven't actually looked into who produces HOOD tools as I've always just used what we have). >Come down to earth Mr Ward. - Ed >So on the whole, I think it is a good method, it has it's faults but >often the tool one uses is as important as the method itself. I agree. Best Regards John McCabe