From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6ff6ac051491e437 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: john@assen.demon.co.uk (John McCabe) Subject: Re: GNAT Codesize Date: 1996/07/03 Message-ID: <836419219.18965.1@assen.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 163538930 x-nntp-posting-host: assen.demon.co.uk references: <31c8fdd4.5a455349@zesi.ruhr.de> <835637893.1349.0@assen.demon.co.uk> <4r1806$aci@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <4r9jf9$meh@felix.seas.gwu.edu> newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) wrote: >In article <4r1806$aci@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, >Fergus Henderson wrote: >>On the other hand, it might well be a good idea to make the `-s' (strip) >>option the default if `-g' (debug) was not specified on the command >>line during the linking step. That's what I did for the Mercury >>compiler, and we haven't got any complaints about it. >Actually, GNAT/DOS does this. If no -g was specified, it strips the >executable. That's interesting as it was on DOS that I (and some others) originally noticed the huge increase in size over the Meridian compiler (see a previous posting for details). Best Regards John McCabe