From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dab7d920e4340f12 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,dab7d920e4340f12 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: Lawrence Kirby Subject: Re: C is 'better' than Ada because... Date: 1996/06/23 Message-ID: <835544623snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 161705304 x-nntp-posting-host: genesis.demon.co.uk references: <4q8fbo$701@red.interact.net.au> <31CC75C1.5BF2AF6A@jinx.sckans.edu> <31CD3E1A.57D547EC@jinx.sckans.edu> x-mail2news-path: genesis.demon.co.uk organization: none reply-to: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-06-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <31CD3E1A.57D547EC@jinx.sckans.edu> dmorton@jinx.sckans.edu "David Morton" writes: >> >OS is Linux 2.0, GNU g++ > >... >> The observant will have noticed that the sample code isn't written in >> C anyway. > >Of course, the *really* observent may have noticed that I used >g++ to compile it... ;) Which of course begs the question of why you used g++ to compile code that was posted to comp.lang.c and comp.lang.ada. -- ----------------------------------------- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com -----------------------------------------