From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f93747e1bf7a65bb
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.204.154.143 with SMTP id o15mr1384177bkw.4.1330426158337;
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:49:18 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 t13ni79364bkb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!cj6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin <martin@thedowies.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Banging the Ada Drum.
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <83178b55-da15-421a-9747-451db4e495c0@cj6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <967bd137-f854-47e1-9d31-e9236c1c0d00@z31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1330426158 25534 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2012 10:49:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:49:18 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: cj6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.8;
 posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALERCFNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-02-28T02:49:17-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 28, 9:39=A0am, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[snip]

  FOR I in 30 ..1030 LOOP
    A(I) :=3D Alices_Digital_Signature.GetUnits(Numin =3D> I);
    B(I) :=3D Alices_Digital_Signature.GetUnits(Numin =3D> I);
  END LOOP;

Don't explicitly re-use the array limits in loops, prefer:

   for I in A'Range loop
      A (I) :=3D ...

Now the compiler may not inject checks on "A (I)" as it knows that the
range of "I" is derived directly from "A".

Why have different types for A and B - they are both just arrays of
Integer with the same index. If you really want to make them
different, you could do:

   type Index is range 30 .. 1_030;
   type A_Array_Type is array (Index) of Integer;
   type B_Array_Type is new A_Array_Type;

   A : A_Array_Type;
   B : B_Array_Type;

BTW, are you assuming Integer is 32-bits? Because it doesn't have to
be...it could be as small as 16 bits or larger than 32.

-- Martin